Akwei and Intact Insurance: An Abandoned Appeal


Anita Aku Akwei, the applicant was injured in a motor vehicle accident on July 19, 2009.  Differences between Ms. Akwei and Intact Insurance company developed regarding her accident benefits under The Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule and as a result Ms. Akwei applied for arbitration at FSCO under the Insurance Act.


  • March 4, 2014 – Neither applicant or her representation appears for the pre-hearing discussion
  • March 4, 2014 – Arbitration hearing is scheduled for May 9, 2014 at 10:00am
  •  If Applicant appears at hearing it is agreed that it will be turned into a pre-hearing, if applicant does not appear, arbitrator will hear motions to dismiss claims
  • March 6, 2014 – Pre-hearing letter is sent to last known address on record for applicant advising her of the consequences of not appearing at the hearing scheduled for May 9, 2014
  • May 9, 2014 – Applicant does not appear at hearing
  • May 9, 2014 – Applicants claim is dismissed without hearing


Applicants claim was dismissed without a hearing based on rule 68 of the Dispute Resolution Practice Code, which states that:

Dismissal of proceeding without hearing

68.1     Subject to Rule 68.2, an adjudicator may dismiss a proceeding without a hearing where the

proceeding is frivolous, vexatious or is commenced in bad faith.

68.2     Before dismissing a proceeding under the Rule, an adjudicator shall deliver written notice to

all parties of the intention to dismiss the proceeding on the grounds set out in Rule 68.1.

Applicant did not respond to any notices of pre-hearing or hearing dates, has not presented any written objections or submissions.


Applicant’s claim is dismissed.  Costs in the amount of 850.00 dollars are awarded to Intact Insurance Company.

Reasons for Decision

As a result of applicants non-response to notices of hearing etc. her claim is dismissed as having become vexatious under rule 68.  Costs are amended from initial Bill of Costs asking for $2,185.87 as some of those costs were accrued during the portion of the proceedings which applicant had counsel and matters were proceeding.

Vicky Sparks is a Paralegal student at Centennial College in Toronto studying professional communications with Omar Ha-Redeye.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *